Other Kinds of Maps

This is the first post in a new category/series we’re calling Thinking Out Loud. The idea is to create some space on the project blog for hashing out ideas that are still somewhat in development.

We’ve got just under a week to go in our survey of convention organizers—if you ran a comic con, comic arts festival, or related media fandom event in North America during 2017 and haven’t taken it yet, please do check it out! The plan is to use the survey results to build a geo-located data set and, eventually, an interactive map of these events. We think we can learn a lot about cons, CAFs, and media fandom events by looking at where and when they happen.

In the meantime, however, I’ve been considering some other ways we might “map” what we’re calling the organizational field of comic cons and related events. One possibility I’ve been exploring while waiting for surveys to be completed is social network analysis.

The language of social networks is, of course, so normalized as to be almost cliché in our social media age. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and the rest have taught us to think of our own relationships as networks—a collection of nodes connected to one another in a diagrammatic space. But social network analysis is a long-standing approach to representing the social world, and I have a hunch that it can show us some interesting things about comic cons.

For the last week or so, I’ve been spending a couple hours here and there visiting convention web sites and noting the guests they are advertising. For certain kinds of events, at least, guests and featured creators perform an important marketing function, not only providing a reason for fans of specific celebrities and creators to come but also to some extent signalling the kind of experience that will be had at that show.

Unfortunately, unlike the relationships constructed through social media platforms, there’s no way to do this automatically. It’s a slow, laborious process. So far, I’ve identified 1776 individual guests advertised in connection with 24 individual events (in some cases, for a past iteration and in some cases, for upcoming ones) and loaded them into the social network analysis platform Gephi. Here’s one version of what that looks like:

Test network of events (green) and their advertised guests (grey) produced with Gephi.

There’s obviously still a lot more work to be done to fill this out over the coming weeks and months. But some interesting questions are already presenting themselves:

  • The questions we get most frequently about our project are definitional ones: “what’s a comic con?” and “what are the limits of events you’re including?” Can the network of guests tell us something about the kinds of events and the limits of “comiccon-ness”?
  • If pre-existing categories like “pop culture con,” “comic arts festival,” “SF con,” and “zine fest” are apparent in the network, which events and guests bridge these boundaries?
  • How discernible will event organizations be as, for example, many of the same guests appear at Informa, ReedPOP, and Wizard World events, respectively?
  • While there’s a class of big-name guests that move around the field, there are presumably many more guests who focus on local or regional events that are easier and/or more affordable for them to appear at. Will this effect be sufficient for geography to be apparent in the network?

 

What Is Cultural Mapping?

Our project’s first initiative is a survey to map the sector of comic cons, comic art festivals, and related media fandom events in North America. Specifically, we’re using a method called “cultural mapping” to try to understand where (and when) comic cons and related events happen.

Developed within sustainable community development and cultural planning contexts, cultural mapping is regarded as both “a practical, participatory planning and development tool” and “an emerging mode of research” (Duxbury, Garrett-Petts, and MacLennan 2015, 2). Cultural mapping projects systematically document assets and resources (e.g., facilities, events, and organizations) and how they are distributed geographically. Mapping exercises have become commonplace within policy and planning circles, with Jeannote (2015, 100) going so far as to argue that “the principal users and advocates of cultural mapping in Canada now come from the municipal planning world.” Indeed, one benefit of

Our mapping initiative is starting out by constructing an inventory of convention/festival organizations in North America based on a survey of organizers. This survey has been designed with the input of our non-academic partner organizations. In addition to providing information about the sector in the aggregate, we will also use the survey results to build an interactive digital map. Publicly available online, the map will enable scholars, industry stakeholders, and members of the public to explore the convention/festival sector through dynamic, interactive visualizations of North American comic-cons.

Moreover, as Gibson, Brennan-Horley, and Warren (2010, 333) argue, cultural mapping provides a “means to render otherwise non-numerical information,” such as that generated through observations and from interviews, “’empirical,’ to ‘speak’ to those community members and policy makers otherwise sceptical of cultural research.” This research will empower convention organizations to engage governments and sponsors (private and public) regarding both their needs and their contributions to society in new ways.

References

Duxbury, Nancy, W. F. Garrett-Petts, and David MacLennan. 2015. “Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry: Introduction to an Emerging Field of Practice.” Pp. 1–42 in Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry, edited by N. Duxbury, W. F. Garrett-Petts, and D. MacLennan. New York: Routledge.

Gibson, Chris, Chris Brennan-Horley, and Andrew Warren. 2010. “Geographic Information Technologies for Cultural Research: Cultural Mapping and the Prospects of Colliding Epistemologies.” Cultural Trends 19(4):325–48.

Jeannotte, M.Sharon. 2015. “Cultural Mapping in Ontario: The Big Picture.” Pp. 99–116 in Cultural Mapping as Cultural Inquiry, edited by N. Duxbury, W. F. Garrett-Petts, and D. MacLennan. New York: Routledge.